Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Síntomas respiratorios en pacientes con cáncer pulmonar: una comparación del tiempo de consulta entre fumadores y no fumadores

Síntomas respiratorios en pacientes con cáncer pulmonar: una comparación del tiempo de consulta entre fumadores y no fumadores




Section
Research article

How to Cite
Síntomas respiratorios en pacientes con cáncer pulmonar: una comparación del tiempo de consulta entre fumadores y no fumadores.
rev. colomb. neumol. [Internet]. 2003 Sep. 4 [cited 2025 Feb. 22];15(3):105-9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.30789/rcneumologia.v15.n3.2003.1245

Dimensions
PlumX
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Ninguna publicación, nacional o extranjera, podrá reproducir ni traducir sus artículos ni sus resúmenes sin previa autorización escrita del editor; sin embargo  los usuarios pueden descargar la información contenida en ella, pero deben darle atribución o reconocimiento de propiedad intelectual, deben usarlo tal como está, sin derivación alguna.

Carlos Elí Martínez
    Fanny Emilia Morón
      Patricia Meléndez

        Background: There is a controversy around the timing of diagnosis of lung cancer and it's relation with smoking habit. Objective: To compare the time with pulmonary indicator symptoms between smokers and non-smokers with lung cancer. Design: Case-series. Setting: Two hospitals in Bogotá, Colombia. 

        Patients and methods: In patients with a pathological diagnosis of lung cancer and identification of ce/Ju/ar type, we reviewed the time with respiratory indicator symptoms and compared it between groups defined by the plain chest X-ray location, TNM stage and smoking history.
         
        Results: Complete data were acquired for 184 patients with mean age 60 years-old, 59% male gender, anda higher proportion of adenocarcinoma (38.3%) or tumours of the squamous cell type (33.2%). Duration of symptoms were lightly shorter in non­smokers (16 weeks) than in smokers (21 weeks, p 0.040), without differences related to tumor location (central vs.peripherical) or stage in TNM classification. 

        Conclusions: Time to search medical care after the beginning of indicator symptoms is longer in smokers, suggesting a higher tolerance to respiratory symptoms and a probably "negative or reverse detection-signal bias", with potential implications for early diagnosis and screening programs. 


        Article visits 1 | PDF visits 1


        Downloads

        Download data is not yet available.
        1. Smith RA, Glynn T J. Epidemiology of lung cancer. Radio! ClinNorth Am. 2000; 38: 453-470.
        2. Anónimo. Cáncer Broncogénico. En Ramírez G, Patiño JF, Castro CJ (Editores) Guías de Práctica Clínica en Enfermedades Neoplásicas. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá DC. 2001; 271-288.
        3. Patz EF, Goodman PC, Bepler G. Screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1627-1633.
        4. Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Small solitary pulmonary nodule.Radio! Clin North Am. 2000; 38: 471-478.
        5. Park BJ, Louise O, Altorki N. Staging and the surgical management of lung cancer. Radio! Clin North Am. 2000; 38: 545-561.
        6. Wells CK, Peduzzi PN, Feinstein AR. Presenting manifestations, cigarrete smoking, and detection bias in age al diagnosis of lung cancer. Ann Epidemiol. 2001; 11: 239-247.
        7. Mountain CF. Revision in the lnternational System for Staging Lung Cancer. Chest. 1997; 111: 1710-1717.
        8. WHO: The World Health Organization histological typing of lung tumours, second edition. Am J Clin Pathol. 1982; 77: 123-136.
        9. Morón F, Meléndez P, Hidalgo JC, Carrillo J, Lastra G, Bonfante E, Gallego P, Martínez CE. Cáncer broncogénico, tipo celular y presentación radiológica, estudio multicéntrico en Bogotá, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Radiología. 2001; 12: 1007-1012.
        10. Anónimo. IARC Monographs (Vol 83) Tobacco Smoke and lnvoluntary Smoking. (June 2002). Disponible en www.iarc.fr,
        11. Mcfarlane MJ, Feinstein AR, Wells CK, Chan CK. The 'epidemiologic necropsy'. Unexpected detections, demographic selections, and changing rates of lung cancer. JAMA. 1987; 258: 331-338.
        12. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP y cols. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet. 1999 ;354: 99-105.
        13. Wells CK, Feinstein AR. Detection bias in the diagnostic pursuit of lung cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1988; 128: 1016-1026.
        14. Koyi H. and Hillerdal G. Patient's and doctors' delays in the diagnosis of chest tumors. Lung Cancer. 2002: 35: 53 - 57.
        15. Ashley MJ, Cohen J, Bull S y cols. Knowledge about tobacco and altitudes toward tobacco control: how different are smokers and nonsmokers? Rev Canadienne de Sanie Publique. 2000; 91: 376-380.
        16. Frank E, Denniston M and Pederson L. Decline in smokers understanding of tobaccos hazards between 1986 and 1998, a report from north Georgia. South Med J. 2002; 95: 675-680.
        17. Silvestri GA, Zoller JS, Carter C and Bradford D. Current screening and health maintenance of never, former and current smokers: implications for mass screening to detect lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003; 167 (suppl): A 737.
        18. Kaetsu A, Fukushima T, Moriyama M, Shigematsu T. Smoking behavior and related lifestyle variables among physicians in Fukuoka, Japan: a cross sectional study. J Epidemiol. 2002; 12: 199-207.
        19. Barratt A, Mannes P, lrwing L y cols. Cancer screening. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56: 899-902.
        Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |