Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Pressure support ventilation vs. synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. Hemodynamic effects on critically ill patients

Ventilación asistida por presión vs. ventilación mandatoria intermitente sincronizada. Efectos hemodinámicos en pacientes críticos




Section
Research article

How to Cite
Pressure support ventilation vs. synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. Hemodynamic effects on critically ill patients.
rev. colomb. neumol. [Internet]. 2010 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 4];22(4):136-42.

DOI
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Ninguna publicación, nacional o extranjera, podrá reproducir ni traducir sus artículos ni sus resúmenes sin previa autorización escrita del editor; sin embargo  los usuarios pueden descargar la información contenida en ella, pero deben darle atribución o reconocimiento de propiedad intelectual, deben usarlo tal como está, sin derivación alguna.

Carmelo Dueñas

    Carmelo Dueñas,

    Universidad de Cartagena, Unidad de Cuidado Intensivo. Hospital Bocagrande. Cartagena, Colombia.


    Background: Several studies about the hemodynamic effects of pressure support ventilation (PSV) have appeared over the past two years. These studies have been carried out on less than 15 patients, and none of them has compared the physiological effects of PSV and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) on the same patient.

    Objective: To establish the hemodynamic effects of PSV as compared with those of SIMV.

    Design: Prospective, controlled trial.

    Patients and methods: 31 patients were included in the study, from June 1993 to May 1995. They were distributed at random to be handled with SIMV or assist-control ventilation (ACV) during the stabilization phase. Before initiating the weaning, and after random assignation, the patients were put on PSV or SIMV for two hours (STEP 1), and hemodynamic and arteriovenous blood gas measurements were performed. Thereafter the patients were put on ACV for one hour and then to the other ventilation mode for two more hours (STEP 2), with new measurements performed. A 10cc/Kg variable, FIO2 of 40% and PEEP of 4 were maintained. The variables studied were pulmonary capillary pressure (W), central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac index (CI), oxygen supply (DOS), oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), and and lung distensibility (D). The results obtained from the total group (n=31) are presented thereafter on the two steps. We then divided this into two subgroups on the basis of the illness.

    Group 1: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS): sepsis, ARDS, etc.) and Group 2: Severe cardiac failure (SCF). The statistical analysis was done with average, standard deviation (s), and the variables evaluated were analyzed by means of the Student Tos test (p<0,05) Results: No fundamental differences were found among the 31 patients; the same occurred in the group of patients with SIRS, but when comparing the hemodynamics of the patients with SCF it was found that they had a better CI with PSV than with SIMV. The reason for this could be in that PSV reduces the preload, which could be of benefit in this type of patients. PSV reduces IVO2 because it facilitates ventilator/patient coupling. From the ventilatory point of view, improved
    oxygenation was evident with PSV in all the groups.

    Conclusion: PSV may be considered the method of choice for the management of patients with SHF.


    Article visits 112 | PDF visits 94


    Downloads

    Download data is not yet available.
    1. Marini J, Capps J, Culver B. The inspiratory work of breathing during assisted mechanical ventilation. Chest 1985; 87: 612-8.
    2. Tobin MJ. Mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1056-60.
    3. Ingenito EP, Orzen J. Mechanical ventilators. In: Hall JB, Schmidt GA, Wood LOH: Principies of Critical Care. McGraw-Hill. New York 1992. p. 142.54.
    4. Strieter RM, Lynch JP III: Complications in the ventilated patient. Clin Chest Med 1988; 9: 127.
    5. Pierson OJ. Complications associated with mechanical ventilation. Clin Care Clin 1990; 6: 711-24.
    6. Miro AM, Pinsky MR. Heart-Iung interactions. In: Tobin MJ: Principies and practice of mechanical ventilation. McGraw-HiII, Inc. New York. 1994. p. 647-71.
    7. Pinsky MR. Hemodynamic effects of artificial ventilation. In: Shoemaker WC, Aures SM, Grenvik A, Holbrook PR: Textbook of critical care. Third de. WB Saunders CO. Philadelphia. 1995. p. 911-23.
    8. Pinsky MR. The effects of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Clin 1990; 6: 663-77.
    9. Petty TL. A historical perspective of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Clin 1990; 6: 489-503.
    10. Esteban A, Benito S, Alfa 1, et al. Multicenter study of mechanical ventilation in ICUs in Spain. Medlnten 1993; 17:8 (S).
    11. Cohen IL, Ziya B, Krishnamurthy S. The effects of ventilator working pressure during pressure support ventilation. Chest 1993; 103: 588-92.
    12. Hudson LO. Cardiovascular complications in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care 1983; 28: 627.
    13. Biondi JW, Schulman OS, Matthay RA. Effects of mechanical ventilation on right and left ventricular function. Clin Chest Med 1988; 9: 55.
    14. Pinsky MR. The effects of mechanical ventilation on the cardiovascular system. Crit Care Clin 1990; 6: 663-77.
    15. Buda AJ, Pinsky MR, Ingels NB, et al. Effect of intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular perfomance. N Engl J Med 1979;301: 453-9.
    16. Rasanen J, Vaisanen IT, Herkkila J. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by respiratory failure. The effects 01 mechanical ventilation. Chest 1984; 85: 21-8.
    17. Robotham JL, Steven MS. Effects of positive and negative pressure ventilation on cardiac perfomance. Clin Chest Med 1 983;4:161-88.
    18. Snider GL. Historical perspectiva on mechanical ventilation: lrom simple lile support system to ethical dilemma. Am Rev Respir Ois 1989;140:52-7.
    19. Pierson OJ. Complications associated with mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Clin 1990; 6: 711-24.
    20. Sasson CSH, Maheutte CK, Light RW. Ventilator modes: Old and new. Crit Care Clin 1990; 6: 605-34.
    21. Macintyre NR. Respiratory lunction during pressure support ventilation. Chest 1986; 89: 677-83.
    22. Macintyre NR. Pressure support ventilation: effects on ventilatory reflexes and ventilatorymuscie workloads. Respir Care 1987;32: 447-57.
    23. Macintyre NR, Nishimura M, Usad Y, et al.The Nagoya conlerence on system design and patient-ventilator ineractions during Pressure Support Ventilation. Chest 1990; 97: 1463-6.
    24. Brochard L Harft A, Lovino H, LeMaire F. Inspiratory pressure support prevents diaphragmatic latigue during from mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 139: 513-21.
    25. Kacmarek RM. The role of pressure support ventilation in reducing work of breathing. Respir Care 1988; 33: 99-120.
    26. Maclntyre NR. Effects of initial flow rate and breath termination criteria on pressure support ventilation. Chest 1991; 99: 134-8.
    27. Van de Graaff WB, Gordey K, Domseif SE, et al. Pressure support. Changes in ventilatory pattern and components of the work of breathing. Chest 1991; 100: 1082-9.
    28. Banner MJ, Maclntyre NR. Patient and ventilator work or breathing and ventilatory muscle loads at different levels of pressure support ventilation. Chest 1991; 100:531-3.
    29. Maclntyre NR, Leatherman NE. Ventilatory muscle loads and the frequency-lidal volume pattern during inspiratory pressure-assisted (Pressure-Supported) ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141: 327-31.
    30. Wysocki M, Tric L, Wolff MA. Noninvasive pressure support ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Chest 1993;103: 907-13.
    31. Maclntyre NR. Respiratory function during pressure support ventilation. Chest 1986; 89: 677-83
    32. Prakash O, Meij S. Cardiopulmonary response to ínspiratory pressure support during spontaneous ventilation vs conventional ventilation. Chest 1985; 88: 403-8.
    33. Tahvanainen J, Salmenpera M, Nikki P. Extubation criteria after weaning rom intermitent mandatory ventilation and continuos positive airway pressure. Crit Care Med 1983; 11:702-7.
    34. Tobin MJ, Perez W, Guenther SM, et al.The pattern of breathing during successful and unsuccessful trials of weaning from mechanical ventilation.Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 134:1111-8.
    35. Goldstone J, Moxham J. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Thorax 1991; 46: 56-62.
    36. Tobin MJ, Yang K. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Clin 1990; 6: 725-47.
    37. Milic-Emili J. Is weaning an art or a science? Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 134: 1107-8.
    38. Tomlinson JR, Miller S, Lorch DG, et al. A prospective comparison of IMV and T-Piece weaning from mechanical ventilation. Chest 1989; 96: 348-52.
    39. La Riccia PJ, Katz RH, Peters JW, et al.Biofeedback and hypnosis in weaning from mechanical ventilation. Chest 1985; 87: 267-9.
    40. Holliday JE, Hyers TM. The reduction of weaning time from mechanical ventilation using tidal volume and relaxation biofeedback. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141: 1214-20.
    41. Dowus JB, Klein EF Jr, Desautels D. Intermittent mandatory ventilation. A new approach to weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Chest 1973; 64: 331.
    42. Venus B, Smith RA, Mathru M. National survey of methods and criteria used for weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 1987; 15: 530.
    43. Schachter EN, Tucker D, Beck GJ. Does Intermittent mandatory ventilation accelerate weaning? JAMA 1981; 246: 1210.
    44. Marini JJ, Caps JS, Culver BH. The inspiratory work of breathing during assisted mecha ni cal ventilation. Chest 1985; 85: 612-8.
    45. Tobin MJ, Alex Ch. Discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. In: Tobin MJ: Principies and practice of mechanical ventilation.McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York. 1994. p. 1177-207.
    46. Stoller JK. Current controversies in applyng specific modes of mechanical ventilation. In: Hall JB, Schmidt GA, Wood LDH: Principies of critical Care. McGraw- Hill. New York. 1992. p. 155-9.
    47. Poelaert JL, Vogelaers DP, Colardyn FA. Evaluation of the hemodynamic and respiratory effects of inverse ratio ventilation with a right ventricular ejection fraction catheter. Chest 1991;99: 1444-50.
    48. Jansen JRC, VersprilleA. Imporvement of cardiac output by the termodylution method during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 1986; 12: 71-9.
    49. Civetta JM. Pulmonary artery catheter insertion. In: Spring CL (ed): The pulmonary artery catheter. Methodology and clinical application. Rockville, MD. 1979, Aspen: 22-33.
    50. Leatherman JW, Marini J. Clinical use of the pulmonary artery catheter. In: Hall JB, Schmidt GA, Wood LH: Principies of critical care. McGraw-HiII. New York. 1992. p. 323-42.
    51. Shan KB, Raotlk, Laughlin S, et al. A review of pulmonary artery catheterizations in 6245 patients. Anesthesiology 1984; 61: 271.
    52. Putterman CE. The Swan-Ganz catheter: A decade of hemodynamic monitoring. J Crit Care 1989; 4: 127.
    53. Goldenheim PD, Kazemi H. Current concepts: Cardiopulmonary monitoring of critically ill patients (Part 2). N Eng J Med 1984;770.
    54. Sahn SA, Lakshminarayan S. Bedside critería for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Chest 1973; 235: 1002-5.
    55. Praskash O, Meij SH. Oxygen consumption and blood gas exchange during controlled and intermittent mandatory ventilation after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 556-9.
    56. Esen F, DenkeiT, Telci L, et al. Comparison of pressure support ventilation (VPS) and intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) during weaning in patients with acute respiratory failure. Adv Exp Med Biol 1992; 3170: 371- 6.
    57. Brochard L. Pressure support ventilation. In: Tobin MJ: Principies and practice of mechanical ventilation. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York. 1994. p. 239-57.
    58. EstebanA, Alia Y, Ibañez J, et al. Modes of mechanical ventilation and weaning. A national survey of spanish hospitals. The spanish lung failure collaborative group. Chest 1994; 106: 1188-93.
    59. Esteban A, Frutos F, Tobin MJ, Alia Y, et al.A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Spanish lung failure collaborative group. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 345-50.
    60. Tokioka H, Saito S, Kosaka F. Effect of pressure support ventilation on breathing pattern and respiratory work. Intensive Care Med 1989; 15: 491-4.
    61. Hurst JM, Branson RD, Davis K, Barrette RR. Cardiopulmonary effects of pressure support ventilation. Arch Surg 1989; 124:1067-70.
    62. Fassoulaki A, Eforakopulon M. Cardiovascular, respiratory and metabolic changes produced by pressure-supported ventilation in intensive care patients. Crit Care Med 1989; 17: 527-9.
    63. Califf RM, Bengtson JR. Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1724-9.
    64. Hurford WE, Favorito F. Association of myocardial ischemia with failure to wean from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 1995; 23: 1475-80.
    65. Hurford WE, Lynch KE, Strauss HW, et al. Myocardial perfusion as assessed by thallium-201 scintigraphy during the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation in centilator-dependent patients. Anesthesiology 1991; 74: 1007-16.
    66. Lemaire F, Teboul JL, Cinotti L, et al. Acute left ventricular dysfunction during unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anesthesíology 1988, 69: 171-9
    Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |