Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

The data management system in research studies: methods and guidelines

El sistema de manejo de datos en los estudios de investigación: métodos y guías




Section
Others

How to Cite
The data management system in research studies: methods and guidelines.
rev. colomb. neumol. [Internet]. 2008 Dec. 1 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];20(4):185-92.

DOI
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Ninguna publicación, nacional o extranjera, podrá reproducir ni traducir sus artículos ni sus resúmenes sin previa autorización escrita del editor; sin embargo  los usuarios pueden descargar la información contenida en ella, pero deben darle atribución o reconocimiento de propiedad intelectual, deben usarlo tal como está, sin derivación alguna.

Adriana Pérez M.
    Carlos Andrés Cáceres R.

      Adriana Pérez M.,

      Profesora asociada, Unidad de Epidemiología Clínica y Bioestadística, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana y Profesora Asistente, Departamento de Matemáticas y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Colombia


      Carlos Andrés Cáceres R.,

      Asistente de Investigación en Estadística. Unidad de Epidemiología Clínica y Bioestadística. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, D.C., Colombia


      The planning of the data Management system in research Studies is evaluated from different aspects. Initially, we delimited some functions and specified its relevant role during all study phases, from the data processing coordinating center point of view. We emphasized over the importance of a close and routinely communication between centers in order to assure minimum deviations from protocol and calendar established. Several components to this system are presented including software and hardware considerations, data quality assurance procedures and monitoring. Finally, we presented some guidelines regarding data base preparation for analysis and adequate documentation of the project. Although this system is presented in general context, it could be applied to research studies on a single center.


      Article visits 31 | PDF visits 108


      Downloads

      Download data is not yet available.
      1. Levin WC, Fink DJ, Porter FS, Hall TC, Loeb V Jr. Cooperative clinical investigation: a modality of medical science. JAMA 1974; 227: 1295-6.
      2. Schoenbach VJ, Arrighi HM. Data management and data analysis, 1994. No publicado.
      3. Telefor. Basic script reference guide for teleform 5. Cardiff software, Inc. 1997. San Marcos, California.
      4. McFadden ET, Lopresti F, Bailey LR, Clarke E, Wilkins PC. Approaches to data management 1995; 16: S30-S65.
      5. Hosking JD, Newhouse MM, Bagniewska A, Hawkins VS. Data collection and transcription. Control Clin Trials 1995; 16: S66-S103.
      6. Spilker B, Schoenfelder J. Data collection form in clinical trials. New York, Raven press, 1991.
      7. Wright P, Haybittle J. Design of forms for clinical trials (tres partes). British Medical Journal 1979; 529-30, 590-2, 650-1.
      8. Bourque LB, Clark VA. Processing data. The survey example. Sage publications. London, 1992.
      9. Converse JM, Presser S. Survey questions. Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Sage publications. London, 1986.
      10. Blumenstein BA, James KE, Lind BK, Mitchell HE. Functions and organization of coordinating centers for multicenter studies. Control Clin Trials 1995; 16: S4-S29.
      11. Gassman JJ, Owen WW, Kuntz TE, Martin JP, Amoroso WP. Data quality assurance, monitoring and reporting. Control Clin Trials 1995; 16: S104-S36.
      12. Kanatterud GL, Rockhold FW, George SL, Barton FB, David CE, Fairweather WR, Honohan T, Mowery R, O’neil R. Guidelines
      13. for quality assurance in multicenter trials: a position paper. Control Clin Trials 1998; 19: 477-93.
      14. Day S, Fayers P, Harvey D. Double data entry: What value, what price? Control Clin Trials 1998; 19: 15-24.
      15. Gibson D, Harvey AJ, Everett V, Parmar MK. Is double data entry necessary? The HCART trials. Control Clin Trials 1994; 15: 482-8
      16. Reynolds-Haertle RA, McBridge R. Single vs double data entry in CAST. Control Clin Trials 1992; 13: 487-94.
      17. IC International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. Guideline for good clinical practice. ICH Secretariat. Geneva, 1996.
      18. Meinert CL. Clinical trials and treatment effects monitoring. Control Clin Trials 1998; 19: 512-22.
      19. McBride R, Singer SW. Interim reports, participant closeouts and study archies. Control Clin Trials 1995; 16: S137-S67.
      20. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley & Sons. New York, 1987.
      21. Multiple imputation after 18 years. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1996; 91: 473-89.
      22. Schafer JL. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman y Hall. Londres, 1997.
      23. Mandasky a. Prescriptions for working statisticians. Springer Verlag. New York, 1988.
      24. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Segunda edición. Oxford University Press. Oxford, 1995.
      25. McKinney WP, Young MJ, Hartz A, Lee MB. The inexact use of Fisher’s exact test in six Major Medical Journals. JAMA 1989; 261: 3430-3
      Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |