Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Concordance between clinical diagnosis and a questionnaire based on symptoms to assess the diagnostic possibility of COPD in colombian patients

Concordancia entre el diagnóstico clínico y un cuestionario basado en síntomas para establecer la posibilidad diagnóstica de EPOC en pacientes colombianos




Section
Research article

How to Cite
Concordance between clinical diagnosis and a questionnaire based on symptoms to assess the diagnostic possibility of COPD in colombian patients.
rev. colomb. neumol. [Internet]. 2009 Jun. 1 [cited 2024 Nov. 25];21(2):69-72.

DOI
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Ninguna publicación, nacional o extranjera, podrá reproducir ni traducir sus artículos ni sus resúmenes sin previa autorización escrita del editor; sin embargo  los usuarios pueden descargar la información contenida en ella, pero deben darle atribución o reconocimiento de propiedad intelectual, deben usarlo tal como está, sin derivación alguna.

Rafael Acero Colmenares
    Diego Huertas Rosselli
      Juan Carlos Castro Muñoz
        Jorge Enrique Ospina Aguirre

          Rafael Acero Colmenares,

          Médico especialista en Medicina Interna y Neumología. Jefe de neumología, Fundación Santafé de Bogotá. Bogotá, Colombia


          Diego Huertas Rosselli,

          Médico, especialista en Pediatría y Neumología. Departamento Médico, Boehringer Ingelheim. Bogotá, Colombia.


          Juan Carlos Castro Muñoz,

          Médico, especialista en Farmacología. Departamento Médico, Boehringer Ingelheim. Bogotá, Colombia.


          Jorge Enrique Ospina Aguirre,

          Médico, Magíster en Farmacología. Investigador asociado, AHA Institución del investigador principal: Fundación Santafé de Bogotá. Patrocinador: Boehringer Ingelheim S.A., Bogotá, Colombia


          Introduction: Questionnaires based on symptoms can be useful for screening patients with COPD within the general population, or as a tool for differential diagnosis that can facilitate early initiation of therapy in places where spirometry is not available.

          Methodology: In a pilot study, 105 Colombian specialized physicians and general practitioners applied an 8-question questionnaire to 778 of their patients, who had been previously diagnosed with COPD. It was not taken into consideration whether the patients were or were not receiving drug therapy for COPD at the moment of answering the questionnaire.

          Results: The scores allowed classification of the patients into three risk categories: 1. Low risk (117 patients); 2. Moderate risk (125 patients); and 3. High risk (536 patients). The average score was 22,5 (SD: 5,57). These results suggest that the instrument’s sensitivity is 68,9%, and that the questionnaire did not detect 31,1% of the patients as having COPD. All questionnaires were correctly filled out, and no conditions besides those of an ordinary medical consultation were required.

          Conclusions: The questionnaire assessed in this study showed scarce diagnostic correlation with the clinical expertise of the attending physician. In order to assess all the diagnostic properties of this questionnaire or of its modifications, spirometry is required as the golden standard for the diagnosis of COPD. The use of brief diagnostic questionnaires within the frame of ordinary medical consultation is logistically possible and does not demand additional resources or time


          Article visits 39 | PDF visits 28


          Downloads

          Download data is not yet available.
          1. Martinez FJ, Raczek AE, Seifer FD, Conoscenti CS, Curtice TG, D’Eletto T, Cote C, Hawkins C, Phillips AL. Development and initial validation of a self-scored COPD Population Screener Questionnaire (COPD-PS). COPD. 2008 Apr ;5(2):85-95.
          2. Calverley PMA, Nordyke RJ, Halbert RJ, Isonaka S, Nonikov D. Development of a population-based screening questionnaire for COPD. COPD. 2005 Jun ;2(2):225-232.
          3. van der Molen T, Willemse B, Schokker S, ten Hacken N, Postma D, Juniper E. Development, validity and responsiveness of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2003 ;1(1):13.
          4. GOLD - the Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [Internet]. [cited 2009 Mar 25 ] Available from: http:// www.goldcopd.com/
          5. Medicina [Buenos Aires] - Nuevo consenso argentino de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica [Internet]. [cited 2008 Dec 25 ] Available from: http://www.scielo.org.ar/ scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0025-76802003000500012
          6. Celli BR. The importance of spirometry in COPD and asthma: effect on approach to management. Chest. 2000 Feb ;117(2 Suppl):15S-9S.
          7. Medicina [Buenos Aires] - Encuesta a neumonólogos sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de EPOC [Internet]. [cited 2009 May 1]
          8. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S0025- 76802004000200004&script=sci_arttext
          9. Price DB, Tinkelman DG, Halbert RJ, Nordyke RJ, Isonaka S, Nonikov D, Juniper EF, Freeman D, Hausen T, Levy ML, Ostrem A, van der Molen T, van Schayck CP. Symptom-based questionnaire for identifying COPD in smokers. Respiration. 2006;73(3):285-295.
          Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |