Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Analysis of the economic impact of mometasone/formoterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Colombia

Análisis del impacto presupuestal de mometasona/formoterol en enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica en Colombia




Section
Research article

How to Cite
1.
Analysis of the economic impact of mometasone/formoterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Colombia. rev. colomb. neumol. [Internet]. 2016 Aug. 11 [cited 2024 Nov. 13];26(2). Available from: https://revistas.asoneumocito.org/index.php/rcneumologia/article/view/45

Dimensions
PlumX
license

Ninguna publicación, nacional o extranjera, podrá reproducir ni traducir sus artículos ni sus resúmenes sin previa autorización escrita del editor; sin embargo  los usuarios pueden descargar la información contenida en ella, pero deben darle atribución o reconocimiento de propiedad intelectual, deben usarlo tal como está, sin derivación alguna.

Jacqueline Pavia, MD.
    Elkin V. Lemos, MD., PhD.
      Margarita Restrepo, MD., MSc.
        Fidel Lozano, MD.

          Introduction: mometasone/formoterol is a metered-dose pressurized inhaler that contains corticosteroids and a long-acting beta-agonist; it provides efficient symptom control in cases of COPD. The recommended dose is two inhalations, twice daily.

          Objetive: to develop an analysis of the economic impact of the introduction of mometasone/formoterol in the Colombian healthcare system over the period from 2013 to 2017. This analysis gives an estimate of the financial implications of the use of this medication in patients older than 40 years with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

          Materials and methods: from the perspective of the healthcare system, a model was designed for determining the effect of the introduction of mometasone/formoterol on the system’s resources. The guidelines and recommendations used in such studies were followed, taking into account the specific target population, the study’s perspective, and the time frame. Clinical and epidemiological information was drawn from the available medical literature (Colombian guidelines), and costs were gathered from the national handbook of drug prices (SISMED) for the year 2013. Cost analysis was done in two scenarios: with and without discount, using a constant 3%-rate for the years under study. The robustness of the results was evaluated by a univariate sensitivity analysis.

          Results: through the population-based model, for a cohort of 46.927.125 people in Colombia, and applying epidemiological data, it is estimated that a total number of 119.962 patients would have the specific indication to receive treatment with a fixed combination. The net annual costs (2013-2017) with the inclusion of mometasone-formoterol were $88.050; $88.052; $88.053; $88.053; and $88.054 Colombian pesos respectively for each year. The impact of the total budget of mometasone/formoterol (without discount) over a five-year period is $11.76 (11 million Colombian pesos, approximately). The sensitivity analysis was focused on the total impact on the budget and its relation with the compliance to fixed-dose combinations.

          Conclusion: the results of the analysis of budget impact shows that the inclusion of mometasone/formoterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, compared with other fixed-dose combinations, has the potential to reduce the total costs of the budget in the Colombian healthcare system.


          Article visits 1074 | PDF visits 752


          Downloads

          Download data is not yet available.
          1. Schiavi E, Stirbulov R, Hernandez Vecino R, Mercurio S, Di Boscio V, en nombre del Equipo Puma. COPD screening in primary care in four latinamerican countries: Methodology of the PUMA study. Arch Bronconeumol. 2014 May 7. pii:S0300-2896(14)00118-5. doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2014.03.006.
          2. Caballero A, Torres-Duque CA, Jaramillo C, Bolivar F, Sanabria F, Osorio P, et al. Prevalence of COPD in five colombian cities situated at low, medium, and high altitude (PREPOCOL study). Chest. 2008;133(2):343-9.
          3. Cunningham TJ , Ford ES, Rolle IV , Wheaton AG, Croft JB. Associations of self-reported cigarette smoking with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and co-morbid chronic conditions in the United States. COPD. 2015 Jun;12(3):276-86.
          4. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [Internet]; 2008.(Consultado 06 Jun 2013). Disponible en: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs315/en/
          5. Acosta N, Peñaloza R, García J. Desarrollar el plan de análisis y la elaboración de informes del análisis de situación de salud de Colombia 2002 - 2007. 01/08/2005. Report No.: ASS/1502-08.
          6. Dekhuijzen PN, Bjermer L, Lavorini F, Ninane V, Molimard M, Haughney J. Guidance on handheld inhalers in asthma and COPD guidelines. Respir Med. 2014;108(5):694-700.
          7. Proyecciones Nacionales y Departamentales de población 2005-2020 [Internet]; 2014. [Consultado 06 Jun 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.dane.gov.co/
          8. Lindberg A, Bjerg A, Ronmark E, Larsson LG, Lundback B. Prevalence and underdiagnosis of COPD by disease severity and the attributable fraction of smoking report from the obstructive lung disease in northern sweden studies. Respir Med. 2006;100(2):264-72.
          9. Sullivan SD, Mauskopf JA, Augustovski F, Jaime Caro J, Lee KM, Minchin M, et al. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: Report of the ISPOR 2012 budget impact analysis good practice II task force. Value Health. 2014;17(1):5-14.
          10. Guía metodológica para la elaboración de guías de atención integral en el sistema general de seguridad social en salud colombiano.[Internet]; 2010. [Consultado 06 Jun 2013]. Disponible en: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/salud/Documents/Gu%C3%ADa%20Metodol%C3%B3gica%20para%20la%20elaboraci%C3%B3n%20de%20gu%C3%ADas.pdf
          Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |