Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Validation in Spanish of the self-administered Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ-AUTOSELF)

Validación en español del cuestionario específico para enfermedad respiratoria crónica autodiligenciado (CRQ-AUTOSELF)




Section
Research article

How to Cite
Validation in Spanish of the self-administered Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ-AUTOSELF).
rev. colomb. neumol. [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 3 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];28(1):17-23. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.30789/rcneumologia.v28.n1.2016.160

Dimensions
PlumX
license

Ninguna publicación, nacional o extranjera, podrá reproducir ni traducir sus artículos ni sus resúmenes sin previa autorización escrita del editor; sin embargo  los usuarios pueden descargar la información contenida en ella, pero deben darle atribución o reconocimiento de propiedad intelectual, deben usarlo tal como está, sin derivación alguna.

Olga Chapeton Chaves, FT.
    Liliana Fernández T., MD.
      William Martínez, MD.
        Fernando Sanabria, MD.
          Juliana Lenis, FT.

            Olga Chapeton Chaves, FT.,

            Fisioterapeuta, Especialista en Fisioterapia Cuidado Crítico Adulto, Jefe Servicio de Terapia Respiratoria y Rehabilitación Pulmonar, Fundación Valle del Lili. Docente cátedra Universidad del Valle, Especialización en Fisioterapia Cardiopulmonar, Docente Cátedra Universidad CES, Especialización Cuidado Crítico Adulto. Cali, Colombia.


            Liliana Fernández T., MD.,

            Especialista en Medicina Interna y Neumología, Neumología Intervencionista, Línea del Investigación Biomédica en Tórax, Fundación Valle del Lili. Profesora Clínica Asociada, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Icesi. Cali, Colombia.


            William Martínez, MD.,

            Especialista en Medicina Interna y Neumología, Línea del Investigación Biomédica en Tórax, Fundación Valle del Lili. Profesor Clínico Asistente, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Icesi. Cali, Colombia.


            Fernando Sanabria, MD.,

            Especialista en Medicina Interna y Neumología, Línea del Investigación Biomédica en Tórax, Fundación Valle del Lili. Profesor Clínico Asistente, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Icesi. Cali, Colombia.

            Juliana Lenis, FT.,

            Fisioterapeuta, Especialista en Actividad Física Terapéutica, Fisioterapeuta Rehabilitación Pulmonar y coordinadora de Fisioterapia Programa Trasplante Pulmonar, Fundación Valle del Lili. Cali, Colombia.


            Nandy Castro, FT.,

            Fisioterapeuta, Especialista en Actividad Física Terapéutica, Fisioterapeuta Rehabilitación Pulmonar y coordinadora de Fisioterapia Programa Trasplante Pulmonar, Fundación Valle del Lili. Cali, Colombia.

            Alejandro Castillo, MD., MSc.,

            Especialista en Psiquiatría, Maestría en Epidemiología, Fundación Valle del Lili. Profesor Clínico Asistente, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Icesi. Cali, Colombia.


            Introduction: the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire is mentioned in many studies that assess the impact of non-pharmacologic interventions on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It requires a trained interviewer, which demands time. The self-administered version has shown excellent validity and sensitivity to detect changes, compared to other instruments. Although it has been validated in the Spanish spoken in Spain, the terms used are not clear or familiar to the Latin American population.

            Objetive: to validate in Latin American Spanish the self-administered CrQ on a wide variety of chronic pulmonary diseases.

            Materials and Methods: cross-cut study for validating a scale with cultural adaptation and translation from the original English version; in order to carry out the validation and the factor analysis, a criterion of at least 5 persons or participants per item of the instrument was used. In this case, the CrQ has 20 items, for a total number of 126 participants. Data analysis was done with the 10,0 version of the StAtA program.

            Results: a total number of 126 patients who filled the complete scale were included. Factor analysis of the instrument was carried out; the KMO index was first calculated, and found to be 0,92, which leads to the conclusion that the obtained matrix is factorizable. The factor analysis by main components was carried out; four factors were obtained, which explains the 71,1% variance.

            Conclusions: the results of the study give evidence about the validity and reliability of the scale in the self-administered version of the CrQ in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other advanced pulmonary diseases.


            Article visits 1848 | PDF visits 2663


            Downloads

            Download data is not yet available.
            1. Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Key Concepts and Advances in Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:e29-35.
            2. Singh SJ, ZuWallack RL, Garvey C, et al. Learn from the past and create the future: the 2013 ATS/ERS statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:1169-74.
            3. Guyatt GH, Townsend M, Keller J, et al. Measuring functional status in chronic lung disease: conclusions from a randomised control trial. Respir Med. 1989;83:293–7.
            4. Guyatt GH, Berman LB, Townsend M, et al. A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax. 1987;42:773–8.
            5. Güell Rous MR, Díaz Lobato S, Rodríguez Trigo G, Morante Vélez F, San Miguel M, et al. Rehabilitación respiratoria. Arch Bronconeumol. 2014;50(8): 332–44.
            6. Williams JEA, Singh SJ, Sewell L Morgan MDL. Health status measurement: sensitivity of the self-reported Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ-SR) in pulmonary rehabilitatio. Thorax. 2003;58;515-8.
            7. Jones PW. Health status measurement in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2001;56:880–7.
            8. Vigil L, Güell MR, Morante F, López De Santamaría E, Sperati F, Guyatt D, et al. Validez y sensibilidad al cambio de la versión española autoadministrada del cuestionario de la enfermedad respiratoria crónica (CRQ-SAS). Arch Bronconeumol. 2011;47(7):343-9.
            9. Lacasse Y, Wong E, Guyatt GH, et al. Meta-analysis of respiratory rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 1996;348:1115–9.
            10. Boueri FM, Bucher-Bartelson BL, Glenn KA, Make BJ. Quality of life measured with a generic instrument (Short Form 36) improves following pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD. Chest. 2001;119:77-84.
            11. Puhan MA, Behnke M, Frey M, Grueter T, Brandli O, Lichtenschopf A, et al. Self-administration and interviewer administration of the German Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire: instrument development and assessment of validity and reliability in two randomized studies. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;8(2):1.
            12. Doyle C, Dunt D, Ames D, Selvarajah S. Managing mood disorders in patients attending pulmonary rehabilitation clinics. Int J of COPD. 2013;8:15-20.
            Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |